Columns
The face of Manipulative History in the Itsekiri Narrative of Warri as their Homeland.
By Benedict Binebai
Manipulative history often distorts the truth by presenting a biased interpretation of events, omitting key facts, and misrepresenting evidence to fit a specific narrative or ideology. This can be achieved through propaganda, simplification, or stereotyping, which can be used to influence opinions or beliefs.The Itsekiri history of Warri justifies the subheadings of manipulative history in the following ways:
Biased Interpretation
The Itsekiri narrative often portrays themselves as the sole founders and owners of Warri, downplaying the roles and contributions of other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This selective presentation of facts supports a predetermined narrative of Itsekiri dominance and ownership.
Omission of Key Facts
The Itsekiri narrative often omits or glosses over the historical conflicts and power struggles between the Itsekiri and other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This omission of key facts creates an incomplete and inaccurate picture of Warri’s history.
Distortion of Evidence
The Itsekiri narrative often misrepresents or manipulates historical evidence to support their claims to dominance and ownership. For example, they may emphasize their historical relationships with European colonizers to justify their perceived superiority over other communities.
Propaganda
The narrative often uses emotive language and loaded terminology to influence readers’ opinions or beliefs. For example, they use terms like “founding fathers” or “traditional owners” to emphasize their perceived historical rights and privileges.
Simplification or Stereotyping
The Itsekiri narrative often oversimplifies the complex historical relationships between the Itsekiri and other communities, portraying themselves as the sole beneficiaries of Western education, Christianity, and modernization. This oversimplification perpetuates negative stereotypes about other communities and reinforces Itsekiri exceptionalism.
Lack of Transparency
The Itsekiri narrative often lacks transparency regarding its sources, methods, and potential biases. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate the historical narrative critically and identify potential manipulations or distortions.
Emotional Manipulation
The Itsekiri narrative often uses emotive appeals or sensationalism to elicit a specific response or reaction from readers. For example, they may emphasize their historical cultural heritage or traditional practices to evoke a sense of nostalgia or pride, while downplaying the cultural heritage and traditions of other communities.
By examining the Itsekiri history of Warri through these subheadings, it becomes clear that the narrative exhibits characteristics of manipulative history, which can be used to justify a particular agenda or ideology.
Consequences of Manipulative History
Manipulative history can have far-reaching consequences, including the perpetuation of biases and stereotypes, justification of oppression or dominance, and erosion of trust in historical narratives and institutions. By distorting the past, manipulative history can create a false narrative that supports a particular agenda or ideology, leading to ongoing social and cultural tensions. This can contribute to polarization and conflict, as certain groups may feel marginalized or excluded from the dominant narrative.
The consequences of manipulative history can also be seen in the loss of cultural heritage and the undermining of critical thinking. By erasing or distorting certain narratives or perspectives, manipulative history can lead to a lack of understanding and appreciation for the complexities of the past. Furthermore, manipulative history can inform poor decision-making and policy development in the present, as inaccurate lessons are drawn from a distorted past. Ultimately, manipulative history can have a profound impact on our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world, highlighting the importance of promoting accurate and nuanced historical narratives.
Column – IduwiniVoice
Where falsehood reigns for decades, truth can reign everlastingly. This underscores the enduring power of truth, even in the face of prolonged deception. This notion is particularly pertinent in contexts where misinformation and falsehoods have been deeply ingrained in societal narratives, such as in the case of the “Warri Falsehood” and the “Warri Truth.” Here, the city of Warri in Nigeria serves as a microcosm for the struggle between falsehood and truth, where decades of misrepresentation and distortion can be challenged by the emergence of authentic voices and narratives.
The Warri Falsehood may manifest in various forms, including historical revisionism, cultural appropriation, or the suppression of marginalised voices. For instance, the dominant narratives surrounding Warri’s history and culture may have been shaped by those in positions of power, often to the detriment of the city’s indigenous communities. However, the Warri Truth represents a counter-narrative that seeks to reclaim and reassert the authentic experiences and perspectives of the region’s people. This truth-telling can take many forms, including art, literature, and oral traditions.
The struggle between the Warri Falsehood and the Warri Truth is not merely an academic or intellectual exercise; it has real-world implications for the people of Warri and beyond. When falsehoods are allowed to reign unchecked, they can perpetuate harm, injustice, and inequality. Conversely, the emergence of truth can be a powerful catalyst for healing, reconciliation, and social change. By amplifying the voices and stories of marginalised communities, the Warri Truth can help to create a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the region’s history and culture.
Ultimately, the triumph of truth over falsehood requires a sustained commitment to critical inquiry, cultural preservation, and community engagement. As the people of Warri and other affected communities continue to challenge dominant narratives and assert their own truths, they can create a more just and equitable society. By embracing the complexities and diversity of their experiences, the Warri Truth can reign everlastingly, providing a powerful testament to the enduring power of authenticity and resilience.
Truth is God’s greatest virtue of existence; let us respect and celebrate it.
Igumugumu
Prof. Benedict Binebai
The chains that bind us come in many forms – oppression, ignorance, fear. They weigh us down, restrict our potential, and silence our voices. But there is a powerful force that can shatter these chains: truth. When we confront the truth, no matter how difficult or uncomfortable, we begin to break free from the shackles that hold us back.
Truth has a way of illuminating the darkest corners of our minds and societies. It exposes the lies, the injustices, and the inequalities that perpetuate our bondage. As we embrace the truth, we gain the strength and courage to challenge the status quo, to demand change, and to fight for our rights. The chains that once bound us begin to weaken, and we start to feel the warmth of freedom’s breeze on our skin.
Breaking chains with truth is not a one-time event; it’s a continuous process. It requires vigilance, determination, and a commitment to seeking knowledge and understanding. As we uncover more truths, we become more empowered to take control of our lives, to make informed decisions, and to shape our own destinies. The chains that once held us captive begin to crumble, and we emerge stronger, wiser, and more resilient.
When we break chains with truth, we not only liberate ourselves, but also inspire others to do the same. Our stories, our experiences, and our triumphs become beacons of hope for those still trapped in the darkness of ignorance and oppression. As we march forward, hand in hand, truth becomes the rallying cry that unites us in our quest for freedom, justice, and equality. Together, we can shatter the chains that bind us and forge a brighter, more enlightened future.
By Nicolas Leighton
In the journey of building a successful business, many entrepreneurs find themselves wearing every hat-juggling sales, operations, customer service, and beyond. But as the business grows, so does the need for a team and with it, a new challenge emerges :learning to let go.
For many business owners, delegation feels like a risk. There’s a fear that employees won’t meet the high standards set by the founder-often for good reason. After all, no one is likely to match the owner’s passion or commitment. But real growth demands more than personal efforts’, it requires a team that not only supports the vision but is empowered to help drive it forward.
The secret to successful delegation lies not in simply offloading tasks, but in transforming team members into strategic contributors. Here’s how smart entrepreneurs are doing it.
Share the vision – and the “Why” Behind it
Leadership is more than issuing directives ‘, it’s about aligning everyone with a common purpose. Business owners must go beyond surface – level goals and communicate the deeper mission that drives their decisions. When teams understand the purpose behind the work and see how their roles fit into the broader vision – they become more invested in the outcome.
One way to do this is through transparency. Sharing key business data, including Financials and performance metrics can foster trust and give employees context for their efforts. It shifts their perspective from executing tasks to being part of a bigger journey
Empower, Don’t Micromanage
Entrepreneurs often fall into the trap of micromanagement, believing it’s the only way to maintain quality. But micromanaging stiles innovation and undermines trust. Instead of assigning isolated tasks,business leaders should hand over full processes or projects, allowing team members to take ownership from start to finish.
Delegation should be outcome – based – focused on the result rather than the method.
This approach gives employees the freedom to make decisions within clear boundaries. For example, managers might be empowered to approve expenses up to a certain limit, encouraging initiative without losing oversight.
Equally important is preventing “reverse delegation”, where problems are handed back up to the owner. Instead, leaders should encourage solution – oriented thinking, promoting staff to propose answers rather than than rely on top – down problem – solving.
Incentivize Impact
Passion can’t be expected without purpose – and a paycheck alone rarely ignites high engagement. Motivation a team means understanding what drives them individually. While financial incentives like bonuses or profit-sharing can be effective , non-monetary rewards such as flexible work hours, additional time off or professional growth opportunities can be equally compelling.
Each employee is different. and it’s the leader’s job to identify what motivates their team and align incentives with company goals.
Build a Culture of Feedback
Delegation is a dynamic skill that improves over time through open dialogue. When expectations aren’t met, it’s often due to unclear instructions or lack of resources – not incompetence. Rather than abandoning delegation after one poor result, leaders should establish regular feedback loops. Constructive conversation helps clarify expectations and refine processes for better outcomes.
Ultimately, delegation isn’t just a management tactic – it’s a leadership necessity. It takes practice, patience, and sometimes outside support. Working with a business coach can provide the perspective and strategies needed to delegate effectively and lead with confidence.
In today’s fast – moving business world, the most successful entrepreneurs aren’t those who do it all themselves – they’re the ones who build teams capable of thinking and acting with ownership. When done right, delegation doesn’t just lighten the load – it multiplie the impact.