News
Electoral Fraud: What we must do for INEC to work
Electoral Fraud: What we must do for INEC to work
hi
By Dayo Johnson,Regional Editor, South West; Samuel Oyadongha; Rotimi Ojomoyela; Egufe Yafuborghi; Chioma Onuegbu; James Ogunnaike; Laolu Elijah; Steve Oko; Daniel Abia; Adeola Badru & Ibrahim Hassan-Wuyo
To whom much is given, much is expected. Nigerians had invested their trust in the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC to conduct a credible election in the country. Everything the Commission needed, including funds, had always been provided.
And Nigerians would sacrifice their precious time to cast their votes on the election date hoping their votes would count. But the electoral commission had always failed to live up to their expectations. Nigerians had hoped that INEC would have repented of its evil ways and would use the September 21 Edo State governorship election to redeem its image.
But 25 observer groups who monitored the election, in their reports accused INEC officials of manipulating the election. They specifically fingered collation officers at the Local Government and State Collation Centres for altering the figures that were obtained from the polling units.
The groups in a joint statement also said, “We reject the result declared because there are two sets of result sheets. One was taken to the field, and another to APC in Edo North, some parts of Edo South, and Edo Central. We observed that the military and police disrupted the collation of results at the wards and local government collation centres, including intimidation of INEC officials that collated results contrary to the provisions of the Electoral Act and INEC guidelines. There is a significant concern about the credibility of the results collation process.
“We reject the result of the election which declared the All Progressive Congress Candidate, Senator Monday Okpebholo. There was militarization and use of impunity at wards, local governments and state collation centres. INEC, Military and police have clearly violated the provision of Electoral Act 2022 concerning the collation of results in the governorship election.”
Nigerians in their reactions have expressed total disappointment with the conduct of the Edo governorship election saying it is sad that INEC hasn’t repented from its evil ways. Some have however proffered solutions on how to ensure future elections are credible and the votes of the people will begin to count.
While some called for a constitutional amendment making it mandatory for electronic voting and electronic transmission, and a law barring the President from appointing INEC chairman, others suggested readopting the Option A4 system to avert the manipulative tendencies of INEC officials.
Perpetrators of electoral fraud must be punished —Aborisade
Femi Aborisade, Human rights activist on his part said: ”Future elections may be protected against manipulation by electoral officials only if those suspected to have manipulated the results are made to suffer the consequences for their action. It is impunity that is responsible for electoral officials manipulating results. The critical challenge is whether the system will permit the culprits to be brought to justice. The non-governmental observers, including YIAGA, made a case against the appointment of the INEC Commissioner who conducted the election, arguing that by his relationship with some prominent personalities, he could not be trusted to be concerned with organizing a free and fair election in Edo State. They also decried the shifting of the counting of votes at some local governments to the central collation centre, which was contrary to the electoral law and guidelines issued by INEC. The INEC did not bother. Therefore, impunity, including not acting by the predetermined electoral procedure, is at the root of the votes of the electorate not counting in the emergence of those who rule. Nigeria’s democracy has thus become the democracy of the few and mighty politicians who have captured not only political power but also the wealth of society which they use in compromising institutions and their officers.
We may resort to Option A4 system —Clarkson
Amaebi Clarkson, a legal practitioner and former Spokesperson of the Movement for the Survival of Ijaw Ethnic Nationality in the Niger Delta, MOSIEND, said: “The Edo poll has clearly shown that no amount of electronic intervention in our electoral process will cure election malpractices and manipulation unless we have reorientation of our value system as a people. This can only be done if we get the leadership question right because any positive change in the behavioural pattern of a people comes from the top and not the bottom. The president asking the losers to go to court in the face of such brazen manipulation of election results speaks volumes. It is frustrating that despite the huge resources allocated to INEC and the reforms on paper, it cannot conduct an acceptable election. We may need to look inward and readopt Option A4 system if it can give us any reprieve.”
Nigerians must begin to defend their votes to the last collation centre —Rev Hayab
Rev Joseph John Hayab, former Chairman CAN Kaduna State: ”It is very sad to see that INEC has not repented or learned any tangible lesson from the past electoral malpractices that were committed. INEC has not only again shown that it is Nigeria’s democracy’s biggest enemy but has confirmed that the will of the people does not matter as long as some INEC officials get cheap money from desperate politicians. A political leader who knows his or her victory is not from the people will never listen to the people or serve the people. INEC has failed to keep the trust of the people and the nation who are bigger than the few money bag politicians. The serious consequence of this unpatriotic action by some politicians and some greedy and selfish INEC staff is that we will continue to suffer together from leaders who have no legitimacy and are disconnected from the people. It is now left for the Nigeria public to unite and begin to defend their votes in future elections up to the last collation center since it is so glaring that you cannot find justice during election from INEC to the courts”.
Former Attorney General of Akwa Ibom and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Uwemedimo Nwoko, asserted that Nigeria will never witness free and fair elections under the present crop of leaders in the country. His words, “I think for now Nigeria should just forget about free and fair elections or free and fair judiciary because it won’t work. If we want to be honest with ourselves, there’s no point hoping against hope, no need for us wasting our time. What is the moral pedigree of the present crop of leaders? What is their legal pedigree, what do they have to show in terms of decency in life? I will say it anywhere, Nigerians cannot have free and fair elections with the present crop of leaders and the judiciary will continue to be a victim. Our justices are individuals and we have people who know how to connive and threaten justices. This is not just about bribing them, people go to justices’ houses and threaten them to bend their will”
We must all turn a new leaf—Elder Ambakederimo
Elder Joseph Ambakederimo, Convener, South South Reawakening Group, said: “It is unfortunate that our electoral process is not improving, our elections are getting worse and from what I have seen, it is not going to get better because those shouting about manipulation are also involved, they were just out maneuvered. There was a time in this country when picking the ticket of a political party to contest the general election is as good as winning the poll. There were high profile assassinations and attempted assassinations then. Until all of us turn a new leaf there is nothing anyone can do about what is going on with our elections.”
Continued voter education necessary—Pastor Nwokocha
Pastor Innocent Nwokocha, Executive Director, Initiative For Ideal Development And Emancipatory Leadership In Nigeria “IDEAL-NIGERIA said: “The simple empirical approach cum solution to the whole of this nauseating situation that is fast eating up the electoral confidence of the masses on the electoral umpire and the leadership structure across board is continued voter education and by extension, the strengthening of the entire civil space. The level of corruption in the country now has fast gained traction and momentum. This can only be attributed to weak style of leadership and the increasing and uncontrollable quest for power. Unfortunately, too, the government in power in Nigeria does not have quick fix solutions at hand as it seems obviously embedded in the whole of the shenanigans constituting the rounds. It is high time all Nigerians rose to the occasion and challenged this sepulchral charade .”
Only the judiciary can correct the anomalies—Chief Osuoha
Also, Chief Ikechukwu Osuoha , two time Commissioner for Housing, Abia State, and the Deputy National Legal Adviser of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP called for resistance to a drift towards one party state. Osuoha who described the Edo election as a charade and open display of impunity by the ruling party, however, said that “only the Judiciary can correct the anomalies.” He acknowledged the erosion of public confidence in the Nigeria judiciary but added that “there are still few judicial officers who are still standing. What happened in Edo was a disgrace to our democracy. But shall we resort to violence? No! So, we still have to look up to the judiciary. The judiciary remains the hope of the common man, and that’s why as a party, we have resolved to go to court. There are still some judicial officers who are not compromised and we believe we will always get justice in the end “
Indicted electoral officials must be prosecuted—David-West
Mr David-West Bekinwariye David, Chairman, Civil Liberties Organisation, CLO, Bayelsa State chapter said: “For our future elections not to be manipulated, we must as a people ensure that electoral officials who collect money from politicians to manipulate the process are prosecuted and sent to prison and the case must be disposed of on time.”
Hon Stephen Adewale, former Ondo SDP state chairman: “It’s unfortunate that our electoral system has been one stride forward, two steps backwards since 1999. What transpired in Edo State brings the question of autonomy to the forefront, particularly for sensitive agencies like INEC. As long as the country’s election umpire remains accountable to the president, no progress will be made. In addition, opposition parties can help improve our electoral system by ensuring that political infrastructure exists in every polling unit. In Edo State, like in other recent elections, the APC was able to present a polling unit agent in each polling unit. Even the ruling party in Edo State, the PDP, was unable to do this. As a result, the lack of polling unit agents from opposition parties makes it easier for the party with the most foot soldiers on the ground and the electoral umpire in its pocket to manipulate the election results. And by the time the aggrieved opposition parties decide to approach the court to contest the election results, they will have wasted the court’s time because they will not have genuine evidence from each polling unit to back up their claims due to a lack of reliable polling unit agents in each polling unit.
Edo election the worst in recent times — Peretei
Kennedy Peretei, Ondo state Publicity Secretary of People’s Democratic Party:
“The truth is that the present democratic dispensation is a product of the struggle of Nigerians through a process that caused loss of lives. The soldiers were forced to return to the barracks. Therefore, a civilian government ( with questionable credibility) cannot return to the dark ages. The Edo election was the very worst in recent times and those who rigged the election are asking the victims to approach the Courts, as if the Judiciary is dependable. What I know is that the people are already on edge and will resist any further attempt to subvert their wishes. If you ask me how? l will say, those who make peaceful change impossible, make violent change, inevitable”
There must be positive change of attitude by the electorates —Comrade Olaposi
National Secretary of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), Comrade Oginni Olaposi Sunday said that, “Positive change of attitude by the electorates in Nigeria is needed to have the new Nigeria of our dreams as far as the electoral system is concerned in Nigeria. The sellers and buyers of votes are all culpable and nearly all Nigerian political parties and politicians engage in these illegal practices. The law enforcement agencies like EFCC and Police must ensure that both sellers and buyers of votes are prosecuted and committed to prison to serve as deterrent to others. INEC should also be very ready to perform an impartial role as unbiased umpire. There must be a level playing ground for all political parties and politicians. Any INEC officer(s) that compromises to manipulate election results should be arrested and prosecuted to serve as a deterrent to other corrupt officials. Lastly, until proper orientation is done and imbibed by Nigerians, the performance index of INEC will continue to be below average. Every Nigerian must be ready to vote for candidates of his or her choice without requesting for money or financial inducement.
The security architecture needs improvement—Ogunsuyi
Lanre Ogunsuyi, public analyst: “The electoral process is not a perfect exercise and a strong security framework is necessary to prevent unpatriotic activities. There is clearly inadequate voter education on the importance of voting and the detrimental effects of vote buying and selling. The lack of accountability and transparency in public office, coupled with the financial incentives, intensifies competition. Public offices should be less financially lucrative. The security architecture needs improvement, especially in violence prevention. Civil societies and the media require funding for election duties. There are no perfect elections; victories are often secured by the highest bidder. People are poor and hungry.”
INEC must fish out bad eggs within it— Balogun
Moruff Balogun, Immediate past Vice Chairman, Nigeria Bar Association, Ijebu Ode Branch: ”It is not within the contemplation of the law to have elections that will be holistically acceptable by all and sundry as credible and threat-free. Even the Electoral Act, 2022 does not contemplate that. If the elections are substantially conducted and hitch free, it is credible enough in the eye of the law. We are not unmindful that there are bad eggs in INEC; we have seen cases where INEC personnel were terribly involved in electoral malpractices in connivance with political parties. INEC authorities should be bold enough to fish out these scavengers within the commission before it is too late”.
Deola Abegunrin, a legal practitioner in Oyo State said, “except the electorates change, we should not expect any overnight miracle. We, the people should have attitudinal change so that things will work out. The Judiciary is doing its best.”
Similarly, Babalade Omoyefa, a politician said, “all of us are guilty, from the politicians to the electorates. When you are seeking an appointment into any political office, several people put pressure on you to spend for them. Once you do that, they are ready to go to any length to ensure that their candidates win the election”.
Ayodele Alake, Public Affairs analyst argued that: “the politicians, electorates and the judiciary are culpable even including the so called civil societies. Almost all our hands are soiled. There’s so much hunger in the country and when people are hungry, they will jump at anything that will put food on their tables. This is where the larger portion of the blame goes to the leaders of the country. If they provide all necessary amenities for the citizenry, the urge to be corrupt will be minimised. But, when people are starved, they do unimaginable things during elections and that’s when you see the electorates queuing for loaves of bread during elections”.
Pastor Olabode James, Joint Fellowship Pentecostal church: “the fear of God is lacking in the minds of our people. When you fear God, you will think twice before you sell your votes. There is so much impunity in the system, anybody can just do anything. Where the fear of God is lacking, you should expect anything to happen. That’s what is playing out in the country today. Until we see God as the only provider, people will continue to engage in shady activities.”
Barr Shogbeye Eli, All Progressives Congress, APC, chieftain
“In view of the fast eroding confidence of Nigerians on the country’s electoral process, we must amend the constitution to remove the power of appointing INEC chairman from the President. It is not enough to cancel an election because of electoral fraud. There must be severe punishment for electoral offenders as well. The law should be made not to be a respecter of anybody. Whoever is involved in electoral crime must face severe consequences according to law. Nigeria is also ripe enough to consider the e-mail voting system as one of the surest ways of correcting electoral fraud. E-mail voting will also save Nigerians from the stress of queuing up for hours on election day.
Only electronic voting and transmission can guarantee credible polls —Dr Arabambi
Dr Abayomi Arabambi, National Publicity Secretary of Labour Party (LP) argued that electronic voting, and electronic transmission are the only factors that can guarantee free, fair elections in Nigeria.
He said, “As Nigerians, we can only ensure future elections’ success if the National Assembly can amend the 1999 Constitution to allow electronic voting and electronic transmission of results from polling units. When the Constitutional amendment is done, any elections that fail to abide by it should be rendered invalid and another election should be conducted in such circumstances.
This will assist all political parties to monitor polls process online and winners will know themselves by the conclusion of the elections and any form of manipulation through falsifications or alteration of results will be eliminated completely. Also, this will make our votes count and props up leaders that will serve their people and not god fathers. Also, elected officials across all political parties will be aware that they are responsible to the electorate only and that any attempt to undermine or under perform will spell doom for them in the next general elections as the people owe the right to either retain them or vote them out”.
Culled: Vanguard News
News
Ajapa Field MOU: Ogulagha Stakeholders Call for Review, Transparency and Alignment with Current Realities
By Charity Ebi
OGULAGHA, DELTA STATE — Nearly two decades after a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed between Britannia-U Nigeria Limited and Ogulagha Kingdom in Burutu Local Government Area, stakeholders in the oil-bearing community are calling for a comprehensive review of the agreement to reflect present-day economic and industry realities.
The 2007 MOU, tied to operations at the Ajapa Marginal Field, was introduced as a framework for peace, development and mutual benefit. However, community representatives say that while the agreement may have appeared workable at inception, its fixed financial structure has been overtaken by inflation, rising oil revenues and evolving governance standards within Nigeria’s petroleum sector.
Addressing journalists on behalf of stakeholders, Mr. Jude Iyelagha stressed that the concerns being raised should not be misconstrued as an attack on the integrity of Ogulagha’s traditional or political leadership.
“This is not an attempt to indict or insult the credibility of our revered leaders,” Iyelagha clarified. “Rather, it is an encouragement for leaders to revisit the well-documented terms, review them in line with current realities, and ensure they are fully implemented for the benefit of our people.”
Modest Provisions, Expanding Industry
Under the MOU, provisions reportedly included annual allocations for community drugs, scholarships for secondary and tertiary students, training slots at the Petroleum Training Institute (PTI), allowances for trainees, incentives for science teachers and sitting allowances for kingdom committee meetings.
While these figures may have been considered reasonable in 2007, stakeholders argue that their real value has significantly diminished over time due to inflation. Crucially, the sums were fixed and not indexed to oil prices, production output or inflationary trends.
Using conservative production estimates common to marginal fields in the Niger Delta, observers note that annual gross revenues from such operations could run into tens of billions of naira. When juxtaposed with community allocations that reportedly totalled only a few million naira annually at inception, the proportional disparity becomes a central point of concern.
For residents, the issue is less about confrontation and more about fairness.
Development Expectations in a Resource-Rich Area
Ogulagha Kingdom remains one of the oil-producing hubs in Delta State. Yet stakeholders point to ongoing challenges including limited healthcare facilities, youth unemployment, fragile road networks, environmental vulnerability and constrained access to higher education funding.
Community leaders argue that development in oil-bearing areas should translate into tangible infrastructure such as modern health centres, shoreline protection projects, potable water systems, vocational training hubs and structured employment pipelines.
“The frustration is not hostility towards investment,” a stakeholder noted. “It is about proportionality and visible impact.”
Shareholding Claims and Transparency Concerns
Beyond the MOU, a more complex issue has emerged. Leaders within the kingdom assert that Ogulagha may not only be a host community but also a registered shareholder in the Ajapa Marginal Field structure, allegedly documented with the Corporate Affairs Commission.
If such shareholding exists, corporate law provides for certain rights, including access to audited financial statements, notice of Annual General Meetings and entitlement to dividends where declared.
Stakeholders claim that consistent access to production data, audited accounts and dividend clarity has not been fully established, raising questions about governance participation.
Again, Iyelagha emphasised that the intention is not to cast aspersions.
“We believe in dialogue and institutional engagement. What we are asking for is clarity, transparency and alignment with statutory expectations where applicable,” he said.
Petroleum Industry Act and Changing Standards
Analysts observe that the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) has introduced more structured host community frameworks and governance mechanisms. Agreements executed before the reform era, they argue, may require review to align with contemporary standards of transparency and proportionality.
Stakeholders maintain that revisiting the 2007 framework would not only protect the long-term interests of the kingdom but also strengthen investor-community relations.
Company Response Awaited
Efforts to obtain official comments from Britannia-U Nigeria Limited were unsuccessful at the time of filing this report. The company’s response, when received, will be reflected in subsequent updates.
For now, the central appeal from Ogulagha stakeholders is measured and deliberate: a call for leaders to examine documented agreements, align them with present realities, and ensure that promises made translate into visible, sustainable benefits for the kingdom.
As one community voice put it, “Oil is finite, but our people and our future must endure.”
News
How Ugandan Healers Performed Successful Cesarean Sections in 19th Century – Archived Records
By Favour Bibaikefie
Historical medical records have revealed that indigenous surgeons in the Buganda Kingdom of present-day Uganda were successfully carrying out cesarean sections as early as 1879 — a period when the procedure was still considered highly risky in many parts of Europe.
The account was documented by British medical practitioner and explorer Robert William Felkin, who witnessed and later published details of the operation in the Edinburgh Medical Journal in 1884 under the title “Notes on Labour in Central Africa.”
According to Felkin’s observations, the procedure involved the use of banana wine as a cleansing agent, herbal preparations to manage pain, and cauterization with heated metal to control bleeding. Both mother and child reportedly survived the surgery — an outcome that drew significant attention from European medical circles at the time.
Felkin described the process as orderly and deliberate, noting that the practitioners demonstrated familiarity with anatomy, sterilization methods available to them, and post-operative care. The documentation challenged prevailing 19th-century assumptions that advanced surgical knowledge was absent in African societies before colonial contact.
Medical historians note that cesarean sections in Europe during the mid-1800s were often fatal due to infection and limited antiseptic knowledge. Antiseptic surgical techniques only became widely accepted in Europe toward the late 19th century following developments associated with figures such as Joseph Lister.
Scholars argue that the Buganda example illustrates a broader pattern of indigenous scientific knowledge that predated colonial rule. In his work, historian highlighted the complexity of African societies prior to European intervention, disputing narratives that framed the continent as lacking innovation or structured knowledge systems.
Experts say the 1879 account underscores the need for a more balanced historical perspective — one that acknowledges Africa’s contributions to medicine, technology, and empirical science long before formal Western medical institutions expanded into the continent.
The rediscovery and renewed discussion of such records continue to prompt debates about how global scientific history is written — and whose knowledge systems are recognized.
Source: African Echo
News
Otuaro Congratulates New IPF Leadership, Urges Confidence and Stronger Advocacy for Ijaw Nation
By Favour Bibaikefie
The Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP), Chief (Dr.) Dennis Brutu Otuaro, has congratulated the newly inaugurated leadership of the Ijaw Publishers’ Forum (IPF), led by Senior Comrade Austin Ozobo, urging them to remain confident and focused as they steer the affairs of the organisation.
Speaking through Mr. Prebor Presley, Coordinator of the PAP Delta/Edo State Office, Otuaro commended the IPF for consistently projecting the Ijaw and Niger Delta narrative from a rights-based standpoint. He stressed that strengthening indigenous media platforms such as the IPF should be a collective responsibility, given the body’s strategic relevance to the Ijaw nation, the Niger Delta, and Nigeria as a whole.
According to him, the emergence of the new executive comes at a crucial period when the region requires vibrant voices to intensify advocacy for the rights and interests of its people. He encouraged the leadership to consolidate on the achievements of their predecessors and remain steadfast in pursuing the forum’s mandate.
In his acceptance speech, IPF President, Comrade Austin Ozobo, unveiled an ambitious two-year agenda, including plans to establish a permanent secretariat, set up a printing press, and launch indigenous Ijaw radio and television stations. He called on Ijaw sons and daughters to rally behind the organisation in its quest for peace, unity, and development across the Niger Delta.
Highlighting the forum’s advocacy role, Ozobo declared: “Let every headline, every broadcast, every book, every post send one clear message: The Ijaw people will no longer be spectators in their own land.”
In a goodwill message, Princewill Binebai, spokesperson of the Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide, congratulated the new executive while cautioning against internal discord. He warned that the Ijaw people must recognise external challenges and avoid becoming divided among themselves.
Also speaking, frontline Ijaw politician, , traced the roots of journalism in Nigeria to the Ijaw ethnic nationality. He expressed disappointment over the absence of some Ijaw political figures at the event, noting that he had hoped it would be more “ceremonious,” with Ijaws asserting their presence as the true owners of Warri.
Reaffirming his commitment, Ozobo pledged to uphold the values of “our great organization and work tirelessly to promote the interests of our organization, the Ijaw Nation and the Niger Delta at large.”
He further stated: “The IPF will continue to advocate for the rights and interests of the Ijaw people, and will continue to promote accurate reporting and storytelling about the over 50 million Ijaw people that are balkanized and marginalized in Nigeria. The Ijaw people have a rich cultural heritage, and it is our responsibility to preserve and promote it.
“We will work with stakeholders to promote peace, unity, and development in the Niger Delta region. We will also provide a platform for Ijaw journalists and publishers to advance and grow in the media profession.”
Calling for unity among leaders, the IPF President appealed: “Ijaw leaders to prioritize Ijaw Nation’s development; we should know where we are coming from. This is not the time for divisive governance, but rather a time for inclusive governance.
“Let us wake up from our slumber and stop doing things that will further divide us or underdevelop the Ijaw Nation.”
He concluded by appreciating stakeholders who have supported the forum and urged collective commitment moving forward. “All well-meaning Ijaw sons and daughters to join and support the organization (IPF) in this journey. Let us work together to build a stronger, more united Ijaw Nation where love, justice and peace will reign.”
