Connect with us

Columns

Rivers State Governance: The Need for Stability and Independent Leadership – Idahosa

Published

on

By Favour Bibaikefie

The political atmosphere in Rivers State has been increasingly influenced by growing tensions between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, who currently serves as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). This situation has sparked conversations about the balance between legacy influence and institutional autonomy, as well as the broader need to focus on the collective good of the people of Rivers State.

While the achievements of former Governor Wike in the state are widely acknowledged, many believe it is time for him to allow Governor Fubara the freedom to fully execute his duties without undue interference. Below, we explore the evolving dynamics and the pressing need for a governance framework rooted in respect and progress.

Governor Fubara’s Acknowledgment of Wike’s Legacy

1. Recognition at the Start of His Tenure

Governor Fubara, upon his inauguration on May 29, 2023, openly expressed gratitude to Wike for his contributions to the state. In his inaugural address, he emphasized the importance of building on Wike’s legacy, signaling an intention for continuity and mutual cooperation.

2. Significant Appointments with Wike’s Influence

In the early months of his administration, Governor Fubara reportedly sought input from Wike in several critical decisions. These included:

The appointment of the Chairman of the Traditional Rulers Council.

The selection of the Secretary to the State Government (SSG).

The nomination of key legislative positions such as Speaker, Deputy Speaker, and House Leader.

The composition of the State Executive Council, including Commissioners.

These moves underscored Governor Fubara’s respect for Wike’s network and experience as part of ensuring a smooth transition.

3. Accommodations in Government Operations

Reports suggest that Wike’s influence extended to operational aspects of governance. For instance, project approvals and other key decisions were often attributed to Wike’s input. Additionally, it is noted that Wike’s family continued to reside in the official Governor’s residence, while Fubara occupied alternative accommodations within the Government House complex. This situation demonstrated an unusual level of deference and patience from the current governor.

A Call for Independent Leadership

While Governor Fubara’s efforts to maintain a respectful and collaborative relationship with Wike are commendable, it is imperative for Rivers State to transition into a new phase of governance that prioritizes institutional autonomy.

1. Upholding the Democratic Mandate

As the elected governor, Fubara’s primary responsibility is to the people of Rivers State. Effective leadership requires the ability to independently make decisions that align with the electorate’s expectations, free from external pressures.

2. Wike’s National Role

As FCT Minister, Wike holds a critical national position that demands his full attention. Balancing this role with involvement in Rivers State politics risks diluting his effectiveness in both capacities and undermines his standing as a statesman.

3. Ensuring Institutional Balance

Rivers State belongs to all its residents, not any single individual or political faction. Governance thrives when leaders respect institutional boundaries and prioritize collective progress. Overreach by any one actor could erode public confidence and stall development.

The Way Forward

1. Supporting Governor Fubara

The people of Rivers State must unite behind their governor, providing constructive feedback and engaging actively in the governance process. This solidarity is key to ensuring the state’s continued progress.

2. Allowing Wike to Focus on National Assignments

Wike’s ministerial role offers an opportunity to further enhance his legacy on a national scale. By dedicating himself to the development of the FCT, he can leave a lasting impact without compromising the autonomy of Rivers State’s leadership.

3. Respectful Collaboration

While collaboration between past and current leaders is beneficial, it should be based on mutual respect and a shared vision for the state. Governor Fubara should be allowed the space to implement his policies, while Wike’s insights can be sought when necessary.

Conclusion

Rivers State stands at a crossroads where the decisions of its leaders will shape its future trajectory. History shows that governance driven by collaboration and respect for democratic principles fosters progress, while undue interference can hinder development.

Governor Siminalayi Fubara has shown remarkable patience and respect for his predecessor, Nyesom Wike. Now, it is time for him to be empowered to lead independently, while Wike focuses on his national responsibilities. Together, their cooperation—rooted in boundaries and mutual respect—can ensure that Rivers State remains a model of progress and good governance in Nigeria.

Columns

The face of Manipulative History in the Itsekiri Narrative of Warri as their Homeland. 

Published

on

By Benedict Binebai

Manipulative history often distorts the truth by presenting a biased interpretation of events, omitting key facts, and misrepresenting evidence to fit a specific narrative or ideology. This can be achieved through propaganda, simplification, or stereotyping, which can be used to influence opinions or beliefs.The Itsekiri history of Warri justifies the subheadings of manipulative history in the following ways:

Biased Interpretation

The Itsekiri narrative often portrays themselves as the sole founders and owners of Warri, downplaying the roles and contributions of other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This selective presentation of facts supports a predetermined narrative of Itsekiri dominance and ownership.

Omission of Key Facts

The Itsekiri narrative often omits or glosses over the historical conflicts and power struggles between the Itsekiri and other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This omission of key facts creates an incomplete and inaccurate picture of Warri’s history.

Distortion of Evidence

The Itsekiri narrative often misrepresents or manipulates historical evidence to support their claims to dominance and ownership. For example, they may emphasize their historical relationships with European colonizers to justify their perceived superiority over other communities.

Propaganda

The narrative often uses emotive language and loaded terminology to influence readers’ opinions or beliefs. For example, they use terms like “founding fathers” or “traditional owners” to emphasize their perceived historical rights and privileges.

Simplification or Stereotyping

The Itsekiri narrative often oversimplifies the complex historical relationships between the Itsekiri and other communities, portraying themselves as the sole beneficiaries of Western education, Christianity, and modernization. This oversimplification perpetuates negative stereotypes about other communities and reinforces Itsekiri exceptionalism.

Lack of Transparency

The Itsekiri narrative often lacks transparency regarding its sources, methods, and potential biases. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate the historical narrative critically and identify potential manipulations or distortions.

Emotional Manipulation

The Itsekiri narrative often uses emotive appeals or sensationalism to elicit a specific response or reaction from readers. For example, they may emphasize their historical cultural heritage or traditional practices to evoke a sense of nostalgia or pride, while downplaying the cultural heritage and traditions of other communities.

By examining the Itsekiri history of Warri through these subheadings, it becomes clear that the narrative exhibits characteristics of manipulative history, which can be used to justify a particular agenda or ideology.

Consequences of Manipulative History

Manipulative history can have far-reaching consequences, including the perpetuation of biases and stereotypes, justification of oppression or dominance, and erosion of trust in historical narratives and institutions. By distorting the past, manipulative history can create a false narrative that supports a particular agenda or ideology, leading to ongoing social and cultural tensions. This can contribute to polarization and conflict, as certain groups may feel marginalized or excluded from the dominant narrative.

The consequences of manipulative history can also be seen in the loss of cultural heritage and the undermining of critical thinking. By erasing or distorting certain narratives or perspectives, manipulative history can lead to a lack of understanding and appreciation for the complexities of the past. Furthermore, manipulative history can inform poor decision-making and policy development in the present, as inaccurate lessons are drawn from a distorted past. Ultimately, manipulative history can have a profound impact on our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world, highlighting the importance of promoting accurate and nuanced historical narratives.

Continue Reading

Columns

The Warri Journey to Authenticity

Published

on

Column – IduwiniVoice

Where falsehood reigns for decades, truth can reign everlastingly. This underscores the enduring power of truth, even in the face of prolonged deception. This notion is particularly pertinent in contexts where misinformation and falsehoods have been deeply ingrained in societal narratives, such as in the case of the “Warri Falsehood” and the “Warri Truth.” Here, the city of Warri in Nigeria serves as a microcosm for the struggle between falsehood and truth, where decades of misrepresentation and distortion can be challenged by the emergence of authentic voices and narratives.

The Warri Falsehood may manifest in various forms, including historical revisionism, cultural appropriation, or the suppression of marginalised voices. For instance, the dominant narratives surrounding Warri’s history and culture may have been shaped by those in positions of power, often to the detriment of the city’s indigenous communities. However, the Warri Truth represents a counter-narrative that seeks to reclaim and reassert the authentic experiences and perspectives of the region’s people. This truth-telling can take many forms, including art, literature, and oral traditions.

The struggle between the Warri Falsehood and the Warri Truth is not merely an academic or intellectual exercise; it has real-world implications for the people of Warri and beyond. When falsehoods are allowed to reign unchecked, they can perpetuate harm, injustice, and inequality. Conversely, the emergence of truth can be a powerful catalyst for healing, reconciliation, and social change. By amplifying the voices and stories of marginalised communities, the Warri Truth can help to create a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the region’s history and culture.

Ultimately, the triumph of truth over falsehood requires a sustained commitment to critical inquiry, cultural preservation, and community engagement. As the people of Warri and other affected communities continue to challenge dominant narratives and assert their own truths, they can create a more just and equitable society. By embracing the complexities and diversity of their experiences, the Warri Truth can reign everlastingly, providing a powerful testament to the enduring power of authenticity and resilience.

Truth is God’s greatest virtue of existence; let us respect and celebrate it.

Igumugumu

Continue Reading

Columns

COLUMN: THE LIBERATING POWER OF TRUTH.

Published

on


Prof. Benedict Binebai

The chains that bind us come in many forms – oppression, ignorance, fear. They weigh us down, restrict our potential, and silence our voices. But there is a powerful force that can shatter these chains: truth. When we confront the truth, no matter how difficult or uncomfortable, we begin to break free from the shackles that hold us back.

Truth has a way of illuminating the darkest corners of our minds and societies. It exposes the lies, the injustices, and the inequalities that perpetuate our bondage. As we embrace the truth, we gain the strength and courage to challenge the status quo, to demand change, and to fight for our rights. The chains that once bound us begin to weaken, and we start to feel the warmth of freedom’s breeze on our skin.

Breaking chains with truth is not a one-time event; it’s a continuous process. It requires vigilance, determination, and a commitment to seeking knowledge and understanding. As we uncover more truths, we become more empowered to take control of our lives, to make informed decisions, and to shape our own destinies. The chains that once held us captive begin to crumble, and we emerge stronger, wiser, and more resilient.

When we break chains with truth, we not only liberate ourselves, but also inspire others to do the same. Our stories, our experiences, and our triumphs become beacons of hope for those still trapped in the darkness of ignorance and oppression. As we march forward, hand in hand, truth becomes the rallying cry that unites us in our quest for freedom, justice, and equality. Together, we can shatter the chains that bind us and forge a brighter, more enlightened future.

Continue Reading