Columns
Rivers State Governance: The Need for Stability and Independent Leadership – Idahosa
By Favour Bibaikefie
The political atmosphere in Rivers State has been increasingly influenced by growing tensions between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, who currently serves as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). This situation has sparked conversations about the balance between legacy influence and institutional autonomy, as well as the broader need to focus on the collective good of the people of Rivers State.
While the achievements of former Governor Wike in the state are widely acknowledged, many believe it is time for him to allow Governor Fubara the freedom to fully execute his duties without undue interference. Below, we explore the evolving dynamics and the pressing need for a governance framework rooted in respect and progress.
Governor Fubara’s Acknowledgment of Wike’s Legacy
1. Recognition at the Start of His Tenure
Governor Fubara, upon his inauguration on May 29, 2023, openly expressed gratitude to Wike for his contributions to the state. In his inaugural address, he emphasized the importance of building on Wike’s legacy, signaling an intention for continuity and mutual cooperation.
2. Significant Appointments with Wike’s Influence
In the early months of his administration, Governor Fubara reportedly sought input from Wike in several critical decisions. These included:
The appointment of the Chairman of the Traditional Rulers Council.
The selection of the Secretary to the State Government (SSG).
The nomination of key legislative positions such as Speaker, Deputy Speaker, and House Leader.
The composition of the State Executive Council, including Commissioners.
These moves underscored Governor Fubara’s respect for Wike’s network and experience as part of ensuring a smooth transition.
3. Accommodations in Government Operations
Reports suggest that Wike’s influence extended to operational aspects of governance. For instance, project approvals and other key decisions were often attributed to Wike’s input. Additionally, it is noted that Wike’s family continued to reside in the official Governor’s residence, while Fubara occupied alternative accommodations within the Government House complex. This situation demonstrated an unusual level of deference and patience from the current governor.
A Call for Independent Leadership
While Governor Fubara’s efforts to maintain a respectful and collaborative relationship with Wike are commendable, it is imperative for Rivers State to transition into a new phase of governance that prioritizes institutional autonomy.
1. Upholding the Democratic Mandate
As the elected governor, Fubara’s primary responsibility is to the people of Rivers State. Effective leadership requires the ability to independently make decisions that align with the electorate’s expectations, free from external pressures.
2. Wike’s National Role
As FCT Minister, Wike holds a critical national position that demands his full attention. Balancing this role with involvement in Rivers State politics risks diluting his effectiveness in both capacities and undermines his standing as a statesman.
3. Ensuring Institutional Balance
Rivers State belongs to all its residents, not any single individual or political faction. Governance thrives when leaders respect institutional boundaries and prioritize collective progress. Overreach by any one actor could erode public confidence and stall development.
The Way Forward
1. Supporting Governor Fubara
The people of Rivers State must unite behind their governor, providing constructive feedback and engaging actively in the governance process. This solidarity is key to ensuring the state’s continued progress.
2. Allowing Wike to Focus on National Assignments
Wike’s ministerial role offers an opportunity to further enhance his legacy on a national scale. By dedicating himself to the development of the FCT, he can leave a lasting impact without compromising the autonomy of Rivers State’s leadership.
3. Respectful Collaboration
While collaboration between past and current leaders is beneficial, it should be based on mutual respect and a shared vision for the state. Governor Fubara should be allowed the space to implement his policies, while Wike’s insights can be sought when necessary.
Conclusion
Rivers State stands at a crossroads where the decisions of its leaders will shape its future trajectory. History shows that governance driven by collaboration and respect for democratic principles fosters progress, while undue interference can hinder development.
Governor Siminalayi Fubara has shown remarkable patience and respect for his predecessor, Nyesom Wike. Now, it is time for him to be empowered to lead independently, while Wike focuses on his national responsibilities. Together, their cooperation—rooted in boundaries and mutual respect—can ensure that Rivers State remains a model of progress and good governance in Nigeria.
We mourns the physical departure of our revered patriarch, Chief Dr. Edwin Kiagbodo Clark. Though his mortal form may have faded, his essence remains etched in the annals of history. As a great defender of the Ijaw people, a sage historian, and a fearless politician, he embodied the spirit of the Odudu – a mythical force that commands reverence and awe
Like a colossus, Edwin Clark strode across Nigeria’s landscape, leaving an indelible mark on its sands. His voice thundered like the thunder of Egbesu, shaking the foundations of injustice and oppression. With each step, he forged a path of courage, conviction, and unasailable commitment to the Ijaw cause.
As a deity among mortals, Chief Clark’s presence was palpable, his wisdom and guidance sought by many. Though he may have walked among us, his essence transcended the mundane, touching the realm of the sacred. Deities, as the saying goes, do not die; they merely transit to another realm, where their essence continues to inspire and guide.
Farewell, revered patriarch! May your odyssey on earth be remembered for generations to come. Your legacy, like the evergreen mangrove, will continue to flourish, nourished by the waters of our collective memory.
By Admin
Abuja – A proposal to create 31 additional states across Nigeria is currently under consideration by the House of Representatives Committee on Constitutional Review. According to the committee, the move aims to address concerns about representation, governance, and regional development across the country.
The proposed states are distributed across various geopolitical zones, with six states suggested for the North-Central region, four for the North-East, five for the North-West, five for the South-South, and seven for the South-West. The committee has indicated that the proposal is in line with Section 8(1) of the Nigerian Constitution, which outlines the requirements for state creation.
Proposed States by Region
North-Central
1. Benue Ala (Benue)
2. Okun (Kogi)
3. Okura (Kogi)
4. Confluence (Kogi)
5. Apa-Agba (Benue South Senatorial District)
6. Apa (Benue)
7. Federal Capital Territory, Abuja (as an autonomous state)
North-East
8. Amana (Adamawa)
9. Katagum (Bauchi)
10. Savannah (Borno)
11. Muri (Taraba)
North-West
12. New Kaduna (Kaduna)
13. Gurara (Kaduna)
14. Tiga (Kano)
15. Kainji (Kebbi)
16. Ghari (Kano)
South-East
17. Etiti (New)
18. Adada (Enugu)
19. Urashi (New)
20. Orlu (Imo)
21. Aba (Abia)
South-South
22. Ogoja (Cross River)
23. Warri (Delta)
24. Bori (Rivers)
25. Obolo (Rivers & Akwa Ibom), possibly a renamed Oil Rivers State
South-West
26. Toru-Ebe (Delta, Edo & Ondo)
27. Ibadan (Oyo)
28. Lagoon (Lagos & Ogun)
29. Ibeju (Ogun)
30. Ife-Ijesha (Ogun, Oyo & Osun)
31. Oke-Ogun (Ogun, Oyo & Osun)
Constitutional Process for State Creation
The proposal will require approval through a series of legislative steps. The Nigerian Constitution stipulates that for a new state to be established, it must be supported by at least a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly, the State House of Assembly, and local government councils in the affected areas. Additionally, a referendum will be conducted, with the final decision forwarded to the National Assembly for ratification.
This proposed restructuring has generated mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a step toward decentralization and regional autonomy, while others question its feasibility given Nigeria’s economic and political landscape.
What are your thoughts on this development? Share your views!
STATE CREATION: A Call to Unity for Toruebe and Oil Rivers States
The struggle for the creation of Toruebe and Oil Rivers states has reached a critical juncture. In response, the President of the Ijaw National Congress (INC), Professor Benjamin Okaba, has issued a press statement outlining the INC’s position.
As Ijaws, it is imperative that we unite behind the INC’s stance, speaking with “one voice,” “one strength,” and “one vision.” We must defend our collective interests and advocate for our rights.
Let us stand together in solidarity, drawing inspiration from our shared heritage and cultural identity. By doing so, we will demonstrate our unbending commitment to the creation of Toruebe and Oil Rivers states.
The advocacy for the creation of states for the Ijaw nation is anchored on unity of purpose, collective action, cultural pride, and identity. This includes the celebration of Ijaw heritage, promotion of our language, customs, and traditions, and the attainment of economic and political self-determination.
Together, we can achieve our goals and create a brighter future for ourselves, our children, and generations to come.
This is another opportunity. We must rise up, Ijaws, and make our voices heard!
Igumugumu
2021 Voice of the Niger Delta