Columns
CYBERSECURITY: Why Identity Fraud Is On The Rise In Africa
CYBERSECURITY: Why Identity Fraud Is On The Rise In Africa
By Charles Kumolu
Gerrard Olisa–Ashar is the CEO of DigiSign Technologies Limited and co-founder of Diaspora Investment Partners Africa. In this interview, he speaks on how well to safeguard e-business through cybersecurity.
He is a technology enthusiast with an interest in the role of technology in entrepreneurship and economic empowerment in Africa.
He has over two decades of experience in delivering technology and cybersecurity strategies for businesses and sits on the board of multiple companies.
What personal experiences or insights led you to embark on a career in cybersecurity?
Cybersecurity found me. I have always wanted to solve problems and take on new challenges. My career started in technology infrastructure. I began as a technology support analyst and progressed to managing technology services for medium and large enterprises. About a decade ago, I had the opportunity to take on a new challenge – it was to help my employer attain the global standard in information security, ISO27001. This was a critical strategic objective. Since no one in the business had the experience, I nominated myself to take on the challenge of managing the delivery of that project.
That’s how I got into Cybersecurity. I was thrown into the deep end and had to sink or swim – thankfully, I swam. Since then, I have advised enterprises of various sizes on effectively identifying and managing cybersecurity risks.
What are your thoughts on Cybersecurity and the importance of digital document integrity in today’s digital economy?
Although closely related, these are two separate issues for the digital economy so I will take them one at a time.
The importance of cyber security to the digital economy cannot be overemphasized. In fact, I will go as far as to say that without cyber security there is really no digital economy because if you do not put the necessary guard rails in any economy it will tank – same thing for the digital economy. My favourite analogy is likening to building a 20-storey building with a solid foundation. When the building is complete, you don’t see the foundation anymore, but it works underground every day.
The tonnes of pressure in weight from the people, equipment, furniture, etc. in the building is only sustained by an effective foundation, protecting the building and all that is within. Imagine if you did not have the foundation in place – or had the foundation of a 3-storey building. It will only be a matter of time before the building collapses. So Cybersecurity is a key foundational pillar for the digital economy – its job, even when you do not see it, is to ensure that the billions of daily transactions in the digital economy are adequately protected.
This will, in turn, prevent significant harm to individuals, businesses and governments who participate in the digital economy. For instance, a recent cyber attack on a major financial institution in Nigeria resulted in the loss of millions of dollars and the compromise of sensitive customer data. The UN’s Economy Commission for Africa (ECA) reports that Africa’s low level of preparedness in Cybersecurity is costing member countries up to 10% of their GDP annually. That is over $100 billion just for the BIG 4 countries of South Africa ($37b), Egypt ($34b), Nigeria ($25b) and Kenya ($10b) respectively.
These numbers only emphasize why all stakeholders in African digital economies need to collaborate to ensure that their digital economies are resilient enough and adequately protected from the acts of cyber criminals.
On the other hand, digital document integrity is a subset of the broader topic of Cybersecurity. For the digital economy to be effective, interactions must remain digital to optimize the benefits of speed, ease, convenience, security and cost. This means that processes must become digital, including the process of documentation and record keeping. For example, in countries like the UK, it is commonplace to find people who have not visited their banks or doctors in the last 10 years. This is not because they haven’t consumed services from these service providers but because they have done so digitally (online) without the need for physical interaction. All agreements, documents or records have been stored digitally.
It is imperative that the integrity of these agreements is preserved, or they become worthless. To maintain such integrity, banks and hospitals need access to affordable technology services that can help preserve the integrity of these digital documents.
In an era where digital transactions are increasingly the norm when conducting business, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of contracts, deeds, and other documents is paramount.
What are your thoughts on the current state and future potential of Nigeria’s digital economy?
The potential is enormous, but the government and private sector must do a lot of work. As of 2020, Nigeria’s digital economy (or internet economy) was estimated to be worth $24 billion but only contributed 5.6% to its total GDP. When you compare it to South Africa (6.5%) and Kenya (7.7%), even though it performed better than Egypt (4.9%).
If you compare these numbers to an aspiration of the Digital Cooperation Organisation (DCO) – for the global digital economy to contribute 30% to the global GDP by 2030 – you can see Nigeria still has a lot of growth potential.
We have seen a lot of progress in the last decade, but Nigeria’s (indeed Africa) businesses and governments still need to catch up compared to other global economies. I know people talk about technological leapfrogging and the development of our digital economy, but that’s more challenging than it sounds. You need to have the right foundations as a business or a government to catch up.
For example, there is a lot of talk about Artificial Intelligence (AI), which I believe will be the most significant contributor to the development of the global digital economy. However, AI is built on machine learning models, which are built on deep learning models, data analytics, and data sets built on raw data.
If you have poor data collection, you will struggle to leapfrog technologically into implementing AI constructively. Businesses and Governments in countries like the UK and US have been strategically gathering data for decades to help them take advantage of the benefits that AI presents today. So, we must continue to be strategic in building the right foundational infrastructure to help realize the great potential of digital economic benefits for Nigeria.
What challenges and opportunities do you anticipate for Nigeria’s digital economy in the near future, and how do you envision innovative technologies like DigiSign addressing these challenges?
The key challenge I have posited above is an implementable strategic blueprint that compels individuals, businesses, and governments (on all levels) to invest in building the critical foundational pillars of the digital economy.
One of those foundational pillars is ensuring the accuracy and integrity of digital identities. Participants in the digital economy need to have confidence that they are engaging with a natural person and the right person at the other end of a digital device – just as if they were standing in front of them. This is where DigiSign plays a role.
The purpose of DigiSign is to allow people, businesses and governments to engage in the digital economy without fear. We will do this if we fulfil our mission to authenticate digital transactions, guaranteeing trust for people, businesses, and governments worldwide.
What was the driving force behind the creation of DigiSign, and what are your visions for its future impact on the industry?
As someone who has participated in and contributed to developing the UK’s digital economy from a cyber security perspective, I understand what it takes for a business to be appropriately protected from the negative sides of the digital economy.
Also, as someone who engaged early in the digital lending space in Nigeria, I began to see gaps in the digital infrastructure on a small scale. From my interactions with industry players, it became apparent these gaps existed on a much broader national level; in some industries, we have ‘time bombs’ waiting to go off, and we were compelled to do something to stop the clock on the time bomb.
Furthermore, a recent report by Simile Identity shows increased identity-related fraud in Africa.
Driven by urgency, we saw an opportunity to close the gap in the electronic signature space by coming up with a ground-breaking integrated biometric e-signature platform. This innovative (patented) technology ensures the authenticity of all parties that sign a document, reducing the risk of identity fraud or non-repudiation. Traditional e-signature platforms rely mainly on the signatories’ emails as the primary source of verification.
However, this could be stronger at best, particularly in emerging digital economies where there is a need to build trust to encourage more participation in the digital economy.
DigiSign helps businesses do business faster, with less risk and at a lower cost – it is a ‘win-win’ solution for all stakeholders: the user, our customer (the business), the regulator, and the investors.
What sets DigiSign apart from other technologies in the market, and how does it address the challenges of fraudulent signatures and unauthorized document alterations?
DigiSign is an innovation that improves on existing technology to tailor the peculiarities in emerging digital economies where the trust level is significantly deficient when compared to more matured digital economies. Three things set us apart.
First is our vision of becoming the most trusted company in the world. We sell trust, and we can improve the narrative that people, businesses, and governments in Nigeria (or Africa) may not have the same level of trust coefficient attached to them as you would find in other countries.
Secondly, we do not see ourselves as being in the business of signing documents electronically but in the business of creating authentic digital interactions. Electronic signatures are our immediate priority, but we are pursuing a world where every digital transaction is genuine.
The third thing is the uniqueness of our technology. It is amazing, but understandable, that no one has patented this technology. We’ve secured our patent in Nigeria, and our US application is advanced. We have also started applications in the UK, Europe, and several African countries. However, the most important thing for us is the assurance that we can give our customers (with undeniable evidence) that a real person and the right person sign any electronically signed document on our platform.
Can you share any interesting or challenging moments you faced while developing DigiSign and how you overcame them?
We are still a very young company but have faced many challenges. The biggest one up until now was getting the right core team to believe in the vision. DigiSign was conceived years ago but needed the right team to bring it to life. Thankfully, we are past that challenge, and we have built a competent team that shares our vision and is working flat-out every day to pursue that vision relentlessly.
How do you see the future of digital document authentication and Cybersecurity evolving, and what role do you think1 DigiSign will play in this evolution?
We are the future. In our recent pitch deck – we greeted potential investors with this phrase ‘Welcome to the future’ – this, in all humility, is our reality. As biometric technologies become more accessible, we can do a lot more. We see a world where you will no longer need written signatures with all documents or agreements, and having a verified biometric signature is the most secure way to verify the authenticity of signatories to a document. DigiSign is positioning itself as a global leader in biometric digital signatures. A big part of our operational budget goes to research and development to explore ways of delivering increased value to our customers.
How do you see emerging technologies, such as DigiSign, contributing to the growth and development of Nigeria’s digital economy?
It depends on what you mean by emerging technologies. Existing technology will play more of a role in the digital economy. As I noted earlier, there are many foundational pillars of the digital economy that we need to build. Most of these already have mature technologies that can be adopted.
For DigiSign, we are blessed to have the opportunity to contribute to an emerging space. It does come with its challenges, though; market adoption and regulatory framing, for example, are our top concerns right now. We see DigSign playing a pivotal role in guaranteeing trust in many sectors of the digital economy: Finance, Healthcare, Real Estate, e-commerce, and Logistics, to name just a few.
When we succeed, more people, businesses and governments can offer or consume services digitally with increased confidence, and this can only be a good thing for Nigeria’s digital economy in the long term.
In what ways do you believe digital document authentication and cybersecurity solutions can positively impact businesses and individuals within Nigeria’s digital economy?
I’ll go back to my earlier point of foundational pillars. For any economy to enjoy the benefits of a sustainable digital economy, the private and public sectors must work together to deliver key strategic outcomes that form the foundation of the digital economy. This journey has already started but needs to be accelerated. We must work together with stakeholders: people, businesses, and governments
By Benedict Binebai
Manipulative history often distorts the truth by presenting a biased interpretation of events, omitting key facts, and misrepresenting evidence to fit a specific narrative or ideology. This can be achieved through propaganda, simplification, or stereotyping, which can be used to influence opinions or beliefs.The Itsekiri history of Warri justifies the subheadings of manipulative history in the following ways:
Biased Interpretation
The Itsekiri narrative often portrays themselves as the sole founders and owners of Warri, downplaying the roles and contributions of other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This selective presentation of facts supports a predetermined narrative of Itsekiri dominance and ownership.
Omission of Key Facts
The Itsekiri narrative often omits or glosses over the historical conflicts and power struggles between the Itsekiri and other communities, such as the Urhobo and Ijaw. This omission of key facts creates an incomplete and inaccurate picture of Warri’s history.
Distortion of Evidence
The Itsekiri narrative often misrepresents or manipulates historical evidence to support their claims to dominance and ownership. For example, they may emphasize their historical relationships with European colonizers to justify their perceived superiority over other communities.
Propaganda
The narrative often uses emotive language and loaded terminology to influence readers’ opinions or beliefs. For example, they use terms like “founding fathers” or “traditional owners” to emphasize their perceived historical rights and privileges.
Simplification or Stereotyping
The Itsekiri narrative often oversimplifies the complex historical relationships between the Itsekiri and other communities, portraying themselves as the sole beneficiaries of Western education, Christianity, and modernization. This oversimplification perpetuates negative stereotypes about other communities and reinforces Itsekiri exceptionalism.
Lack of Transparency
The Itsekiri narrative often lacks transparency regarding its sources, methods, and potential biases. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate the historical narrative critically and identify potential manipulations or distortions.
Emotional Manipulation
The Itsekiri narrative often uses emotive appeals or sensationalism to elicit a specific response or reaction from readers. For example, they may emphasize their historical cultural heritage or traditional practices to evoke a sense of nostalgia or pride, while downplaying the cultural heritage and traditions of other communities.
By examining the Itsekiri history of Warri through these subheadings, it becomes clear that the narrative exhibits characteristics of manipulative history, which can be used to justify a particular agenda or ideology.
Consequences of Manipulative History
Manipulative history can have far-reaching consequences, including the perpetuation of biases and stereotypes, justification of oppression or dominance, and erosion of trust in historical narratives and institutions. By distorting the past, manipulative history can create a false narrative that supports a particular agenda or ideology, leading to ongoing social and cultural tensions. This can contribute to polarization and conflict, as certain groups may feel marginalized or excluded from the dominant narrative.
The consequences of manipulative history can also be seen in the loss of cultural heritage and the undermining of critical thinking. By erasing or distorting certain narratives or perspectives, manipulative history can lead to a lack of understanding and appreciation for the complexities of the past. Furthermore, manipulative history can inform poor decision-making and policy development in the present, as inaccurate lessons are drawn from a distorted past. Ultimately, manipulative history can have a profound impact on our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world, highlighting the importance of promoting accurate and nuanced historical narratives.
Column – IduwiniVoice
Where falsehood reigns for decades, truth can reign everlastingly. This underscores the enduring power of truth, even in the face of prolonged deception. This notion is particularly pertinent in contexts where misinformation and falsehoods have been deeply ingrained in societal narratives, such as in the case of the “Warri Falsehood” and the “Warri Truth.” Here, the city of Warri in Nigeria serves as a microcosm for the struggle between falsehood and truth, where decades of misrepresentation and distortion can be challenged by the emergence of authentic voices and narratives.
The Warri Falsehood may manifest in various forms, including historical revisionism, cultural appropriation, or the suppression of marginalised voices. For instance, the dominant narratives surrounding Warri’s history and culture may have been shaped by those in positions of power, often to the detriment of the city’s indigenous communities. However, the Warri Truth represents a counter-narrative that seeks to reclaim and reassert the authentic experiences and perspectives of the region’s people. This truth-telling can take many forms, including art, literature, and oral traditions.
The struggle between the Warri Falsehood and the Warri Truth is not merely an academic or intellectual exercise; it has real-world implications for the people of Warri and beyond. When falsehoods are allowed to reign unchecked, they can perpetuate harm, injustice, and inequality. Conversely, the emergence of truth can be a powerful catalyst for healing, reconciliation, and social change. By amplifying the voices and stories of marginalised communities, the Warri Truth can help to create a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the region’s history and culture.
Ultimately, the triumph of truth over falsehood requires a sustained commitment to critical inquiry, cultural preservation, and community engagement. As the people of Warri and other affected communities continue to challenge dominant narratives and assert their own truths, they can create a more just and equitable society. By embracing the complexities and diversity of their experiences, the Warri Truth can reign everlastingly, providing a powerful testament to the enduring power of authenticity and resilience.
Truth is God’s greatest virtue of existence; let us respect and celebrate it.
Igumugumu
Prof. Benedict Binebai
The chains that bind us come in many forms – oppression, ignorance, fear. They weigh us down, restrict our potential, and silence our voices. But there is a powerful force that can shatter these chains: truth. When we confront the truth, no matter how difficult or uncomfortable, we begin to break free from the shackles that hold us back.
Truth has a way of illuminating the darkest corners of our minds and societies. It exposes the lies, the injustices, and the inequalities that perpetuate our bondage. As we embrace the truth, we gain the strength and courage to challenge the status quo, to demand change, and to fight for our rights. The chains that once bound us begin to weaken, and we start to feel the warmth of freedom’s breeze on our skin.
Breaking chains with truth is not a one-time event; it’s a continuous process. It requires vigilance, determination, and a commitment to seeking knowledge and understanding. As we uncover more truths, we become more empowered to take control of our lives, to make informed decisions, and to shape our own destinies. The chains that once held us captive begin to crumble, and we emerge stronger, wiser, and more resilient.
When we break chains with truth, we not only liberate ourselves, but also inspire others to do the same. Our stories, our experiences, and our triumphs become beacons of hope for those still trapped in the darkness of ignorance and oppression. As we march forward, hand in hand, truth becomes the rallying cry that unites us in our quest for freedom, justice, and equality. Together, we can shatter the chains that bind us and forge a brighter, more enlightened future.